If one refuses to believe that:
- The SEC's fraud case constitutes "so called evidence"
- The documented lies of Bordynuik on television and elswhere constitutes "so called evidence"
- The dozens of PR's by Bordynuik, announcing deals and achievements that all went POOOOFFF, constitutes "so called evidence"
- The net loss of over $1MILLION\Month, by a company that claims they can make oil from plastic for a total cost of $10\bbl, constitutes "so called evidence"
- The dilution of shareholders through the selling of TENS OF MILLIONS of discounted shares, since its impossible for Bordynuik to raise cash through any other means, constitutes "so called evidence"
- The fact that Bordynuik surrounds himself with sycophantic morons instead of an experienced management team, constitutes "so called evidence"
- That Bordynuik has done everything possible to avoid having an independent Board of Directors, whose job would be to hold him accountable for his F*ups, constitutes "so called evidence"
- That the CAVEAT EMPTOR status, on a crappy tier of the OTC, constitutes "so called evidence.
Then no, I can't "link you to the so called evidence".
Otherwise, if one accepts the totality of all of the above as constituting "so called evidence", then I already have provided numerous links.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
