News Focus
News Focus
icon url

DarthTrader3

04/30/12 1:52 PM

#32289 RE: fly_fisherman #32275

An example of this is Instagram, which was just purchased by Facebook for $1 billion. It has not produced an ounce of revenue in its 18 months since becoming operational, yet, it is valued so tremendously due to its potential for ad revenue and the number of users that it has established. When it comes to social media or media, valuations aren't calculated based upon current numbers but future revenue potential and user following. With the deals that ICPA has already executed and the ones they are still working on, it's severely undervalued at this level.
icon url

dmlabuda

05/01/12 1:04 AM

#32849 RE: fly_fisherman #32275

I think that perhaps you should run the numbers. A P/E of just 10 times earnings is certainly a very conservative figure so, for the stock to be worth $0.035/share with 355,000,000 shares outstanding how much annual PROFIT (not revenue) does ICPA really need to have to maintain that price???? If $0.035 represents 10 times earnings, that would be $0.0035 earnings per share. So, with 355,000,000 shares outstanding how much annual profit do they need?
icon url

BKMUC

05/01/12 1:53 AM

#32871 RE: fly_fisherman #32275

Absolutely agree!!!

The whole stock market is just about the future!!! Nobody is interested in 2010 or 2011!!! It's 2013, 2014 and even 2015 what counts and makes a PPS grow!!!

Please people don't come up with the past of a stock just to find something negative, while the future of ICPA is more than bright!!!