News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Mike418

04/29/12 7:46 PM

#22579 RE: deafelephant #22573

A very good thing for stockholders is the change in compensation from revenue growth to "based on performance, long term incentives and aligns with growth of margins and net income". Net income not sales.
This puts the pressure on management to make profits which means watching all costs while doing what they seem to do best is selling. IMO
icon url

dakotaben

04/29/12 7:57 PM

#22586 RE: deafelephant #22573

Yeah.... but you must have missed the timeline in which those shares were issued.

First, they issued themselves super secret shares to give them control of the company no matter what.

Then, almost all the way through the year, they implemented this ridiculous bonus plan giving away 1/3 of the company using said super secret shares.

Legal? Perhaps. Would a shareholder claim survive civil litigation? Perhaps. I will give them credit where credit is due, but will also call out what I see as BS. The manner in which the the share structure was set up was very NOT shareholder friendly. It seemed deceptive and shady to me.

Until my shares are worth more than a tootsie roll, these guys, IMO, have not made MSLP yet. Still a work in progress. Some great and some terrible. The bonus thing was terrible IMO.
icon url

Hamham1

04/29/12 8:24 PM

#22596 RE: deafelephant #22573

Are you serious?

1. Multiply the bonus by three since Cory and Jeremy received it as well.

2. Not a bad deal for Jeremy since he didn't even work there for half of the year.

3. Gross margins are 35%. So sales go up $17 million but the net was only $5.95 million. From there they gave themselves $4.98 million in bonuses. That leaves less than a million for EVERYTHING else.

4. The company lost $23 million dollars.

It is impossible to justify the bonus.