According to the information we received at the meet and greet... We were informed that the efficiency results from the Single Cavity Unit were very positive and that the scalability of the unit would bring those efficiency results in line with larger and larger units.
Personally, it did not sound to me that Robert was concerned at all with the efficiency results gained from the SCU, in fact he seemed very pleased by the results. So with having the Multi-Cavity Unit functional under the municipal water pressure load and the fact that WDRP has already established their relationship with UL, I agree with you that it shouldn't be to long before the Efficiency numbers are out, a Manufacturer is Presented, and UL certification is granted.
This gets me thinking... From the meeting ( if someone else who was there could verify this because I just don't remember ) I believe we were told that they were going to select the manufacturer and have the manufacturer test the units efficiency and post those results as an independent 3rd Party. I do remember Robert saying that he wanted a 3rd Party to independently test and post the results because he felt that if he posted the numbers unverified people would not fully trust that his numbers were totally accurate as he is the inventor and obviously wants the numbers to be great.
Either way, it shouldn't be long. I know 7 Years BLAH BLAH BLAH. No one here has been invested in WDRP for 7 Years so stop with the nonsense.
GLTA
GW323
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
