Replies to post #19502 on Premier Investment Properties Inc (fka PIPI)

[Wishful Thinking]

you are wrong

[iblong2]

Sorry Cassandra, you are wrong on this one.

The reason this process took so long was because there were many questions from FINRA. They came back with nine questions. They were all answered. They then came back with three more questions which where also answered. The also wanted clearance with the SEC. The president spoke with the SEC and answered several questions. The SEC as part of their policy would not provide a letter but said that if FINRA had any questions, they should contact the SEC. A few days later, we were approved.

The good news is that these are many of the same questions that will be required to be answered on the 15(c)211 form.

As we have said, there have been many things happening in the background and that finally some things are coming together. I believe this will be the start of full disclosure that everyone has been waiting for.

[space1230]

No, his statement is 100% correct and fact, not opinion. You are making reference to "fraudulent pk's" that "make name changes." He (& I) are making reference to a formerly sec suspended pk. A formerly sec suspended pk (or any stock for that matter) will require addressing the sec suspension. Finra will not approve a name change without satisfactory explanation. Finra is the same one that approves form 211's (as we all know). Don't you think that finra came back with a laundry list of questions, regarding the symbol change, that stemmed from management change to the sec suspension? I'd bet 110% that they did. Finra was obviously satisfied. The SEC most certainly has involvement in the symbol change and finra approval of an sec suspended stock. Absooooo-lutely!




RE: "Additionally, the SEC has absolutely NO involvement in the process of corporate name and ticker changes. Your claim that ANWM/PIPI somehow "passed muster" by the SEC is 100% false.

Fraudluent PK entities change names and ticker symbols frequently."

[Computerbux]

Actually, you're incorrect. FINRA did in fact work with the SEC and were satisfied that there were no problems before changing the ticker symbol....just FYI.