>Jar, are you trying to use the laws of physics to prove the existence of God? If so, a fundamental obstacle to this endeavor is that the laws of physics themselves have not been proven, and in fact can never be proven.
<
I'm not trying to prove God's existence w/ physics. I am showing that the fact of God's existence is consistent with the physical laws as we experience them. The non-existence of God would be inconsistent with physical laws and observations. So the "laws of physics" as commonly understood do "prove" the existence of God.
I think we agree that nothing can be infallibly "proven", as I attempted to illustrate in my prior post. So we are left with "reasonable" accuracy. And we have ample "reason" to believe God is there, He created us, and we are dependent on Him.
There are many "proofs" of God's existence. The position I stated today is simply one.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
