News Focus
News Focus

Jar

Followers 2
Posts 318
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/07/2002

Jar

Re: Math Junkie post# 3930

Monday, 02/03/2003 5:56:51 PM

Monday, February 03, 2003 5:56:51 PM

Post# of 495952
>Jar, are you trying to use the laws of physics to prove the existence of God? If so, a fundamental obstacle to this endeavor is that the laws of physics themselves have not been proven, and in fact can never be proven.
<

I'm not trying to prove God's existence w/ physics. I am showing that the fact of God's existence is consistent with the physical laws as we experience them. The non-existence of God would be inconsistent with physical laws and observations. So the "laws of physics" as commonly understood do "prove" the existence of God.

I think we agree that nothing can be infallibly "proven", as I attempted to illustrate in my prior post. So we are left with "reasonable" accuracy. And we have ample "reason" to believe God is there, He created us, and we are dependent on Him.

There are many "proofs" of God's existence. The position I stated today is simply one.


When you break the big laws, you do not get freedom; you do not even get anarchy. You get the small laws.
- G.K. Chesterton, Daily News, 7/29/1905

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today