Replies to post #41524 on Wanderport Corp (WDRP)

[Gold_Icon]

Completly wrong !!!!!!, the one trying to block the information obtained by the AMF is Amyot no Andrew, as you can see in Lexit's post, anything different said is just not true and misleading.


Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lexit Share Monday, February 27, 2012 1:13:43 PM
Re: EarnestDD post# 41379 Post # of 41394

AMF moved up one of the hearing dates.

13 March 2012

12.
Autorité des marchés financiers
(Girard et al.)
Conseils Hilbroy inc. et Jean-François Amyot (Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg s.e.n.c.r.l, s.r.l.)
Banque Royale du Canada
2011-026
Alain Gélinas
Claude St Pierre
13 mars 2012
9 h 30
Demande de prolongation de blocage
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Gold_Icon]

Completly wrong , again. The 30 mill shares were owned by previous CEO, and became unrestricted and by so added to the float, wasnt dilution, that was reported by the company on their filings at that time, anything diferently said about it is not true and misleading.
Please provide any kind of proof to suport your personal opinions.

[Gold_Icon]

Completly WRONG , again, while the 400 mill shares become unrestricted next month, Robert can only trade a small percentage of them 10% or less each quarter, so basically not the 400 mill will be available for trading inmediatly. Anything diferent said about it is just not true and misleading.
Please provide any proof to support your personal opinion.

[EarnestDD]

ANATOMY OF A SCAM - THE CORTELAZZI / OLLU / AMYOT WAY as it pertains to WDRP. And its still pertinent.
The basic scam coming from out Quebec fraudsters works in the following manner, and WDRP is no exception:
1. Take a shell which you control and buy back as many shares as possible while it has nothing in it and convert loans into more free trading shares such that the majority of all free trading shares are in the hands of the promoters (Cortelazzi/Ollu/Amyot);
2. Find an inventor with a failed technology (MRES) or an inventor with a hopeful technology but the inventor is broke and the technology is going nowhere (WDRP);
3. Restructure the deal somewhat to accommodate the inventor but give him restricted shares;
4. Find some dupe to act as CEO. For MRES this was Poulin. For WDRP this is Martel. Its even better if the CEO is broke and needs money from the scam to survive. In this way the CEO is totally controlled by the scammer promoters.
5. Issue out some Fluffy PR's about how great the technology is and have someone do a very positive site visit. Preferably someone who claims to own millions of shares;
6. Find some individuals in far off places that seem to be legitimate to make claims of contracts and projections. For MRES this was Israel and Spain, for WDRP it appears to be Gavin Ovens in Australia;
7. Put out more fluffy PR's about how the technology is coming along;
8. Sell some shares to naive investors;
9. Issue some more Fluffy PR's with sales projections. For MRES this was Russia, for WDRP its little UMI in Fort Wayne, Indiana;
10. Sell some more free trading shares to new investors buying into the fluffy news about the claimed technology.
11. When the deal ultimately fails, rinse and repeat.
jmo