News Focus
News Focus
icon url

loophole73

08/06/05 1:14 PM

#122356 RE: whizzeresq #122354

Whiz

Thank you for further explaining my post with regard to the option that IDCC had for the appeal. They opted not to worry about the sealing and allow the arbitration to proceed without any reason for delay by Nok. However, the Sanders rulings that were reinstated by Judge Lynn are officially knocked out now. Further, the permissive viewing of the documents was limited to the Nok attorneys, but apparently were requested by the Tribunal and provided by Ericy at the evidentiary hearing. Although the panel members are lawyers and knew the status of the Sanders rulings was contested, I cannot help but believe the removal of seven patent claims from infringement consideration when coupled with the Mot evidence had some effect on the final award.

MO
loop
icon url

IDoCare

08/06/05 1:41 PM

#122358 RE: whizzeresq #122354

"As a result, it seems that whatever rights were granted to Nokia with regard to the sealed documents by virtue of Judge Lynn's order, which as best I can see were limited to use in the arbitration, were not impacted by the Federal Circuit's decision."

Hmmm, that is not good news.
icon url

Ghors

08/06/05 3:23 PM

#122367 RE: whizzeresq #122354

Sorry about that. I thought you made the poison fruit post.

Ghors