Replies to post #5204 on Explor Resources Inc. (fka EXSFF)

[x_man_x]

News out on Dow Jones Newswires. Sorry I could not cut and paste it. "Explor to be featured on CEO clips on the Documentary Channel"

[Pantherman]

In the last year EXS has how many private placements with what number of shares + warrents? I have not researched that information but it is likely fair to say there has been 30% dillution and without those extra shares being added to the pie then the stock price would be 30% higher right? No wrong, the stock price would be lower because there would be no drilling results to report or to add ounces to the game.

At some point very soon we will have to quit the private placements and get an offer or we will have simply dilluted the pie to the point that even a buyout will not mean that much to the current share holders.

The question is where and when will that point be? I hope that we do not need another PP but we will likely have at least one more and maybe two.

Now the question is what is going on behind the scenes that the shareholders are not privy to know? Has the CA progessed or is it just there for AEM to use to their advantage by waiting out the next PP or the will of the management to accept a lower offer? One does not know and so we wait. The only other choice is to sell and look some where else for another play. I still think this is a good investment that will pay off but something has got to give soon.

One way to look at it is at least the SP has been able to maintain most if it's value even with the all the PPs that have taken place.

JMHO, GLTA

[Destinator]

5. The market is clearly not giving the news any positive value.

I disagree. The market WAS clearly ready to let the stock price run after the last drill results were released - until someone jumped in to stop it from rising. This price could have gone much higher and now we would have been able to finance at a much higher price. But someone had other ideas. If they were just interested in taking profits, then why would they not have sold incrementally as the price rose?

So forgive those of us that go 'ballistic' but some of us will not stand by and be taken advantage of in such a manner. There are trading rules in place for a reason. It now time to have them enforced.

[elcaribes]

Tomberry - great post. I agree with 100% of everything you say. And let me address others here. Destinator, I commend you for your optimism and your excellent due dilligence. However, you must look at Tomberry's post. Look at it objectively. Is everything he says not true? EXS is priced where it is priced for a reason or many reasons - most of which the optimists on this board probably do not agree with but it is what it is.

InXS I also agree with your post.... "The problem is CD is not open to listen. Gary and others have tried. I don't think you are going to teach and old dog new tricks." If you are correct, one of two things will happen. CD will take this stock to new all-time highs or he will take it to new all-time lows. Or - for the betterment of all shareholders - he will get top calibre help.

And Maris9, you make a very good poing.... "Has CD gotten too big for his britches? People change and I doubt now that he is in the catbird seat after decades of being an underpaid underling that this guy will relinguish one iota of power."

Many of you may have heard of the most successful Canadian mining duo in history - Bob Hunter & Bob Dickinson. One took care of the corporate matters of their company and the other took care of finding gold properties by using geology, drilling the properties, discovering the gold and then the two Bob's worked with each other in attracting major gold companies to bid on their companies they (together) had proven up. Not just once - but several times - both the Bob's sold their junior's to the highest bidding major gold company - each time enhancing shareholder value with massive gains. The company today is known as Hunter Dickinson.

So I ask this question. Why does CD continue to rule Explor with an iron fist, refusing to do what is best for his shareholders? Why does he not take a page out of the playbook of the most successful mining duo in Canadian history? No one doubts CD's ability as a geologist.....but he cannot continue to operate Explor as a one man show. If he does, it is highly likely that all EXS shareholders will continue to suffer. Road show failures are evidence enough of his shortcomings on the corporate side.

And finally, I am a LARGE shareholder with LARGE losses. Most any investor who has purchased EXS in the open market is down on their investment. How much longer they will stick around is anybody's guess, but after three or four years of total nonperformance, my guess is that time is short. It is only my intent to make suggestions that will benefit each and every EXS shareholder but when management refuses to listen there's really not much we can do.