Replies to post #134717 on World Surveillance Group Inc (fka WSGI)

[flybyday]

Hurry Cole call DOD certainly you are on to something these tests should have been shut down. Only you know the wind properties. Better call L-3 and Eastcor too, no more testing of their engineering or equipment on this platform, hurry Cole you are on to something go dog go... Only Cole knows better than DOD or the companies involved with WSGI, wow do we need you now... Hurry send Acumen to the field with his new coolpix, we are so ready for proof and shiny reflections.

[JackedOnCaffeine]

Really? Are you actually suggesting the wind caused the damage? Any reader of that statement with any level of intelligence would realize it was the implied impact with the building/hangar door that resulted in the damage, not the wind by itself.

Perhaps you believe there will be obstacles such as hangar doors at operating altitude that could result in damage to the airship in the presence of strong wind gusts.

The period of highest risk for this airship would be during launch and recovery, or while moving it into or out of a protective enclosure such as a hangar while the airship is on or near the ground.

You're right. This does get funnier. A post suggesting hangars and other obstacles at altitude is even funnier than a post about the company's impending $200,000 secured promissory note payment due March 3rd. You remember, the one where DiMauro would own all the company assets. The same note that was paid by the company back in May 2011. Yes, very funny. Keep them coming, CT, and we'll keep laughing. LOL