News Focus
News Focus
icon url

dread50above

07/26/05 3:12 PM

#2563 RE: dyna #2558

First, I can imagine why Carlisle and CXO may want to ruin the company. I doubt they did it just for the heck of it. Given the billions of dollars represented by such automotive technologies, I can easily imagine that entity either doesn't want them as competition or would like to acquire them for cents on the dollar.

Regarding typo, you'll note that the 8K from the SEC site has a Aug 23 date. It wasn't released until Monday the 25th. Generally, news like this you file on a Friday, not to open up the week. My guess is that they were responding quickly to the re-resignation and trying to get it into SEC on Friday. Hence, typos. No big deal right? This board specialized in them!

And as for the addition of the word "=temporary", I for one didn't expect that the BOD would never meet again. Heck, TOVC's an on-going concern. They'd have to meet again eventually, wouldn't they?

Finally, regarding Ho. Dyna, I suspect you are right about her resigning if she's not already been removed. Will she "answer some of our questions" ?? That sounds like a prediction from you. Why would you expect anything from Ho to answer 'our' quesitons? If she agrees with Carlisle then they must be right about all his claims??? No, if she resigns, I think its because she was part of the whole deception. She's probably Phil Fain's mother or something......