Replies to post #33606 on Green Oasis (GRNO)

[loanranger]

I just re-read yesterdays posts and see no discussion at all of the lack of news and I've read every post made to this board for a number of months. I've also had exchanges with you and others regarding Ballalan in the past and since absolutely nothing new has transpired on that front in YEARS, I chose not to re-explore the issue with you folks yesterday.

I have done my homework......although I admit that I don't have your length and depth of experience in this stock, thankfully.

My point was not that people "should consider panicking because otcmarkets.com has inadequate information about the company", but rather that the fact that the company itself had not seen fit to provide adequate information to the investing public (as noted by otcmarkets) should be a cause for extreme concern, as I stated in the post.


Again, I know that you are aware of ALL of the issues surrounding GRNO. I felt the need to point out that it is my opinion that Ballalan was not the most important of those, so I did.

My attention was grabbed by a postscript of another poster and I suppose my initial post should have been in response to his, not yours:
"PS. Peter never answered my emails either. Don't read anything into that."


All I'm saying is that, in my admittedly irrelevant opinion, the REAL concern for shareholders should be the lack, and in the case of the last instance (circa 8/30/11) the substance, of communications from the company.

[Ferick]

... perhaps it would be wise to do homework and particpate in that discussion first before suggesting that we should consider panicking because otcmarkets.com has inadequate information about the company.

The issue is not that otcmarkets.com has inadequate information, as it seems. The issue is that management has avoided dissemination of any information to anyone regarding currently ongoing activities at any GRNO facility, the progress of past required report filings that are allegedly being processed and filed by Sharon D. Mitchell, atty. hired or contracted by GRNO management to update reporting requirements in accordance with S.E.C. regulations, updates on mobile equipment from Europe that, according to the last audio interview, was or is on the loading dock and ready for shipment, shipment and sales to Shell Oil as was anticipated through previous implied communications or any related remarks regarding the Balallan suit or European patent no. 99301533.8 which was awarded to Balallan and excludes GRNO from any and all rights to it. It seems to me that, since GRNO has a package coming from Europe, it might have something to do with that patent.

https://data.epo.org/publication-server/pdf-document?PN=EP0940463%20EP%200940463&iDocId=6504637&iepatch=.pdf

Is there really any reason why the current GRNO management would have any interest in this since it has no relationship with current management's business plan? It seems it would have more to do with a sale made to Balallan by B.C. way before the transfer of GRNO to current management. And why would it take twelve years to settle this? With this in mind, why would current management be so reluctant to talk about it?