News Focus
News Focus
Followers 1
Posts 435
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/23/2011

Re: deitcher post# 33606

Saturday, 01/07/2012 5:19:13 PM

Saturday, January 07, 2012 5:19:13 PM

Post# of 35802
... perhaps it would be wise to do homework and particpate in that discussion first before suggesting that we should consider panicking because otcmarkets.com has inadequate information about the company.

The issue is not that otcmarkets.com has inadequate information, as it seems. The issue is that management has avoided dissemination of any information to anyone regarding currently ongoing activities at any GRNO facility, the progress of past required report filings that are allegedly being processed and filed by Sharon D. Mitchell, atty. hired or contracted by GRNO management to update reporting requirements in accordance with S.E.C. regulations, updates on mobile equipment from Europe that, according to the last audio interview, was or is on the loading dock and ready for shipment, shipment and sales to Shell Oil as was anticipated through previous implied communications or any related remarks regarding the Balallan suit or European patent no. 99301533.8 which was awarded to Balallan and excludes GRNO from any and all rights to it. It seems to me that, since GRNO has a package coming from Europe, it might have something to do with that patent.

https://data.epo.org/publication-server/pdf-document?PN=EP0940463%20EP%200940463&iDocId=6504637&iepatch=.pdf

Is there really any reason why the current GRNO management would have any interest in this since it has no relationship with current management's business plan? It seems it would have more to do with a sale made to Balallan by B.C. way before the transfer of GRNO to current management. And why would it take twelve years to settle this? With this in mind, why would current management be so reluctant to talk about it?
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y