News Focus
News Focus
icon url

TFWG

07/07/05 9:29 AM

#117491 RE: rmarchma #117488

rmarchma, I wish somebody in the press would repeat that point!

Best,

Bob
icon url

mschere

07/07/05 10:04 AM

#117499 RE: rmarchma #117488

Ronnie..Am I correct in thinking that Nokia's and Samsung's 4th Quarter 2004 and the first three Quarters of 2005 reported covered sales..will be recorded by IDCC as recurring revenue for 2005? I also estimate this amount to be in the area of some $70 Million on a pro rated basis of their total $350 Million ICC obligation, is this correct? Any input that you can offer on this subject would be most appreciated, since it has not been covered by either IDCC Management nor any Analyst.. TIA
icon url

spencer

07/10/05 1:17 AM

#117920 RE: rmarchma #117488

Hold on. If the estimated royalties for Samsung have not changed since 2003, and Samsung has sold more phones than was estimated in 2003, then doesn't that mean that Samsung gets to pay a lower rate?