Replies to post #17762 on Premier Investment Properties Inc (fka PIPI)

[Hardwood]

Why aren't the other 17 or past 100 issue the same PR statement about retaining an attorney?
Do you Read the SEC weekly digest? Is it SOP for the individuals in the bulletin to retain an attorney and PR about it?
For real, give us an answer to these specific questions.

[space1230]

where do I start. 1) You keep referring to the sec digest which is not the official order. Here is the official order: http://www.sec.gov/litigation/suspensions/2011/34-64612-o.pdf

& here is a great example of the area in which you continue to disregard me (former anwm medical company referenced in California (not NJ) http://www.sanluisobispo.com/2011/06/07/1632721/sec-suspends-trading-in-17-small.html

Protecting themselves? How would one protect themselves if they talk about a mining property with assays while it is false (in your mind)?

Trying to save face? Not to lose the group? How would b/s-ing about anwm, with "the group(s)," money tied up there, help distract "the group" to go onto the "next stock of the year?" Heh????

RE: "...give 3 cheers to Ken for getting involved with yet another incompetent company" <--- If the sec let it go & SIGNED off, one would be lead to believe that there was no longer an issue. That's common sense Greedy. Now ... if the sec revisited of the ticker was 'oh so familiar," well then we're penalizing KA for not being a forecaster.

RE: "inserting nephew as CEO." <--- I still await your explanation as to why you've adopted this as fact, with no verification, & everything else is fiction until proven otherwise.