News Focus
News Focus
Followers 215
Posts 22715
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 05/19/2010

Re: greedy__malone post# 17762

Wednesday, 11/09/2011 9:53:29 PM

Wednesday, November 09, 2011 9:53:29 PM

Post# of 22919
where do I start. 1) You keep referring to the sec digest which is not the official order. Here is the official order: http://www.sec.gov/litigation/suspensions/2011/34-64612-o.pdf

& here is a great example of the area in which you continue to disregard me (former anwm medical company referenced in California (not NJ) http://www.sanluisobispo.com/2011/06/07/1632721/sec-suspends-trading-in-17-small.html

Protecting themselves? How would one protect themselves if they talk about a mining property with assays while it is false (in your mind)?

Trying to save face? Not to lose the group? How would b/s-ing about anwm, with "the group(s)," money tied up there, help distract "the group" to go onto the "next stock of the year?" Heh????

RE: "...give 3 cheers to Ken for getting involved with yet another incompetent company" <--- If the sec let it go & SIGNED off, one would be lead to believe that there was no longer an issue. That's common sense Greedy. Now ... if the sec revisited of the ticker was 'oh so familiar," well then we're penalizing KA for not being a forecaster.

RE: "inserting nephew as CEO." <--- I still await your explanation as to why you've adopted this as fact, with no verification, & everything else is fiction until proven otherwise.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today