Protecting themselves? How would one protect themselves if they talk about a mining property with assays while it is false (in your mind)?
Trying to save face? Not to lose the group? How would b/s-ing about anwm, with "the group(s)," money tied up there, help distract "the group" to go onto the "next stock of the year?" Heh????
RE: "...give 3 cheers to Ken for getting involved with yet another incompetent company" <--- If the sec let it go & SIGNED off, one would be lead to believe that there was no longer an issue. That's common sense Greedy. Now ... if the sec revisited of the ticker was 'oh so familiar," well then we're penalizing KA for not being a forecaster.
RE: "inserting nephew as CEO." <--- I still await your explanation as to why you've adopted this as fact, with no verification, & everything else is fiction until proven otherwise.