Replies to post #129550 on Biotech Values

[iwfal]

Both parties’ lawyers did exactly what one would expect under this scenario: MNTA lowballing and Amphastar exaggerating the prep time to get ready for trial.

You are asserting without explanation so let me at least be completely clear. You are saying that:

a) Momenta hoped to convince the judge of the impact to them by lowballing their potential damages.

b) Amphastar hoped to convince the judge of the impact to them by exagerating their potential damages.

I submit that that requires some explanation.