InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,907.01
(
2.15%
)
US TECH 100
20,131.20
(
2.25%
)
Dow Jones
43,586.80
(
3.23%
)
Brent Oil
75.33
(
-0.09%
)
Bitcoin
74,687.66
(
7.75%
)
Post# of 253536
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

iwfal

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 75
Posts 4751
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/06/2003

iwfal

Member Level

Re: DewDiligence post# 129550

Thursday, 10/27/2011 1:52:40 AM

Thursday, October 27, 2011 1:52:40 AM

Post# of 253536

Both parties’ lawyers did exactly what one would expect under this scenario: MNTA lowballing and Amphastar exaggerating the prep time to get ready for trial.



You are asserting without explanation so let me at least be completely clear. You are saying that:

a) Momenta hoped to convince the judge of the impact to them by lowballing their potential damages.

b) Amphastar hoped to convince the judge of the impact to them by exagerating their potential damages.

I submit that that requires some explanation.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up