Shelly- When IH was newly hatched, it was a Hodge-podge wild-west of unmitigated pumpacity. You could be jailed for an indeterminate stay, or unceremoniously booted from the site at the whim of Mr. Matt, if he thought you to be virtually anything other than a rank and file pennystock afficianado. Mr. Matt spammed every site known to man, and offered up IH as a 'basher-free' zone, where all could pump their wares to the exclusion of descent, or reason. Thankfully, and rightfully that has changed drastically, not only in participant's minds, but in irrefutable reality. IH has benefited greatly from moving forward, and IH has become, in my opinion, and certainly many others, a beacon of neutrality and an active archive of information that no investor can ignore.
"...As I said earlier, these are the people who are voluntarily disclosing. Yes, they are legally required to do so. BUT, how many people instead stay in the shadows and do everything they can to pretend they aren't promoting? Plenty imvho."
I agree, and I do commend the 'IRPs' that do declare, but I also feel the need to remind you that turning a blind eye to this activity (the undeclared, yet known to be) and allowing them to blur reality with vested financial interest, is a remnant from the IH of yore, and doesn't belong or befit, in what I feel is a website that can endure for untold years to come, if this cancer is removed. That can only be determined by Admins, with their own observations, and the input of the community. I think we are both aware of some glaring examples, and to rid IH of these letches wouldn't cause IH to skip a beat.
Thanks.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
