Sorry but I am just not impressed with your last post below. EGOH is not "the landowner"!!! They own controlling interest in the leases. A mineral rights lease, the last time I checked, did not constitute land ownership.
I know SE very well, and he knows me. None of the "Facts" you two posted (that I know of) have been directly verifiable from an independent source or link, which is what I keep asking for, but no one seems to want to post?
So are you saying that Petrolia group will be the operator on the EGOH wells? Why not Questus?
If EGOH owns the leases (or at least controlling interest) why don't they show up at the TRRC. I was told here and by SE that EGOH had fines and liens of some sort on the wells that Questus needed to clear before the wells could be reworked and restarted. If the TRRC has no record of EGOH lease control of these wells, how can we ever do DD and verify the leases even exist? What you are telling me here, does not jive with what SE has told me.
Most of us were given the impression that Questus would be the operator. Why are they not going to be the operator? I already know a good bit about B&B oil, another old disaster tied to EGOH's past.
This is all starting to sound like musical chairs, who is on first, what is on second, and I don't know is on third, LMAO!!!
So far Petrolia just looks like another dummy front to me, new front. Their web site is extremely unimpressive and new!!!
IIRC SE told me Questus had already taken care of some of the fines or similar issues with the EGOH wells. Surely we can find some written proof of that and post it or post a link to it?
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
