News Focus
News Focus
icon url

enemem

10/17/11 4:35 PM

#37721 RE: enemem #37720

If Stoll or others in management aren't willing to go along with Varney's plan, this could end badly for Varney, since he'd need their support, and the support of the BOD.

This looks like a really stupid idea. I don't think the scenario I've been describing is going to happen.
icon url

neuroinv

10/17/11 5:02 PM

#37723 RE: enemem #37720

First of all, I do not know what the Neurolexis/Varney connection is about. I am working on getting some clarification. But I am quite sure that it is not some nefarious conspiracy to transfer IP. Besides the fact that I believe Varney is ethical, there is a very pragmatic reason: If a small company were to violate its fiduciary obligations to shareholders in that way, the company acquiring those assets would be vulnerable to the inevitable ensuing legal action. In other words, the IP/assets would be tainted, and that company would be unable to raise money for the several years it would take for that legal challenge to be heard, and to be resolved. No one is going to invest millions of dollars if ownership of the IP, or gains therefrom, could be stripped away by a court decision.

So that's what it isn't.

NeuroInvestment