you're intent on making this personal, pugdog, aren't you?
"Yes, when goose was doing juniper research, s/he should have known better than to assume diamondi was not offering sports-betting capability, in terms of break-down of three separate categories."
please site the text where i assumed that diamondi is not offering sports betting capability. would you do that for me before you put words in my mouth... again. i'll list what i actually said:
"loflin mentioned in the interview that there are projections that by 2009, wireless handheld gaming will bring in $19 billion in revenue. he likely gathered this information from juniper research. it should be noted, though, that the projected revenue from casino-style gambling is just under a quarter of that at $4.6 billion. if you ask me, i couldn't care less right now whether diamondi will be able to grab a portion of the larger figure or the smaller figure -- just as long as diamondi gets a piece of the pie. has anyone read anything from diamondi that listed lotteries and sports betting as potential sources of revenue? well, in the interview loflin did mention that their technology could be manipulated to fit what the casinos would want or need."
so, again i ask you: where did i was assume that diamondi is not offering sports betting capability? yes, i obviously noted that the projected revenue from casino-style gambling would be just under a quarter of the whole amount of the projected revenue. did you not read the last two sentences of that paragraph? i'll post again for you, as it seems you had difficulty comprehending it:
"has anyone read anything from diamondi that listed lotteries and sports betting as potential sources of revenue? well, in the interview loflin did mention that their technology could be manipulated to fit what the casinos would want or need."
at least captain crunch was able to comprehend what i typed. if i assumed that diamondi is not offering sports betting capability, then why did i ask if anyone had read a release form diamondi that listed sports betting as a potential source of revenue? if i assumed that diamondi is not offering sports betting capability, then why did i note that their technology can be made to fit what the casinos would want or need. if i assumed that diamondi is not offering sports betting capability, then why have i lauded diamondi for their wifitrack gs? there is more than one type of sports betting, and i wanted to know if anyone had information regarding sports betting beyond horse and dog racing. i'm guess that you also assumed that i don't think that diamondi will offer lottery capability.
"Also, I just won’t give loflin any respect for his performance in that interview, regardless of gooses desire to hope for a collective goodwill response from everyone."
i wasn't trying to change your opinion of loflin's interview performance. i was simply telling you that i disagreed with part of what you said. did not see that i agreed with you in part? when someone disagrees with part of what you say and agrees with another part, do you then think that the person disagreed with everything? in fact, i agreed with you regarding two things, and i'll list them here:
"i don't think he sidestepped any questions, but i do think that he was somewhat unsure of himself when coming up with hindrances. i, too, would have liked to have heard about pagcor."
so, do you now see that i agreed with you regarding how he seemed unsure and how he should have discussed pagcor? instead, you think that i disagreed with everything that you said because i disagreed with one thing that you said.
"Goose has gone from extremely leery of diamondI, to an unobjective creature because of his investment at stake."
you're going to have to start listing the messages and texts where i become "extremely leery" and then "unobjective." i was never extremely leery, and i have not become unobjective. how am i the one who is unobjective? let's go through some of your posts:
---
800 Billion (casinos worldwide revenue)*5% (get hold of 5% of the casinos) 4535 casinos*5%=226 casinos (keep in mind it is not the casino quantity, but the casino quality more or less
=40 Billion*8% (cause an 8% increase)
=3.2 Billion*8% (allowed to keep 8% of the increase)
=250.6 Million revenue*8% actual earnings of this revenue
=20.05 Million earnings*the casinos and gaming P/E ratio (33.10)
=663.65 Million Market Cap
---
Posted by: pugdog
In reply to: None
Date:6/2/2005 2:53:47 PM
Post #of 1090
"This stock is ready to SURGE - It is inevitable
tomorrow this stock will reach new heights!"
(hod on 6/2 - $.10; hod never reached more afterwards)
---
Posted by: pugdog
In reply to: None
Date:6/2/2005 2:14:25 PM
Post #of 1090
I had to buy some more...I'm gonna teach some people a lesson
---
Posted by: pugdog
In reply to: halfmillion who wrote msg# 972
Date:6/11/2005 9:26:52 PM
Post #of 1090
yeah with online gambling over the internet, there should be cameras equipped to each computer. you are breaking the law of no contridiction - and you look like a fool
---
Posted by: pugdog
In reply to: None
Date:6/15/2005 9:43:41 PM
Post #of 1090
oh by the way...this patent should go through - it sounds specific which is always a good thing when obtaining a patent.
---
Posted by: pugdog
In reply to: None
Date:6/22/2005 11:03:33 PM
Post #of 1090
If I knew everything I know now about diamondI, except for the price per share - I would guess that diamondI is trading between 50 cents and 75 cents a share right now.
---
Posted by: pugdog
In reply to: pugdog who wrote msg# 541
Date:5/14/2005 4:46:29 PM
Post #of 1090
I hope loflin gets on this board and realizes that he has a lot to prove to others and to himself (especially in terms of character in my opinion). He needs to get motivated to succeed just once in his life.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
