Santeon Group Inc (SANT)

[goosemeister]

pugdog, i'm expecting that you will post the specific comments where i was extremely leery (which means "suspicious" or "distrustful") and then unobjective. if you're going to make this personal, i'm expecting for you to provide the evidence. by the way, if you're going to cite messages 736 and 741, then i must implore you to read again messages 745, 755, and especially 771.

also, would you please explain why you wanted loflin to talk about wi-fi implementation instead of ("in lue" of) the constant motion at sea?

---

Posted by: pugdog
In reply to: goosemeister who wrote msg# 1084
Date:6/25/2005 1:52:00 AM
Post #of 1091

i wanted to hear him actually talk about wi-fi implementation in lue of the fact that the motion will be continous on a cruise ship is most situations, meaning the wireless protocall option(s) should be mentioned.

---

"Yes, when goose was doing juniper research, s/he should have known better than to assume diamondi was not offering sports-betting capability, in terms of break-down of three separate categories."

i find it odd that you're the one targeting me for assuming something, even though that's not what i was doing. consider in post 750 that you thought the outstanding share count was 95.5 million -- when the actual outstanding share account, according to halfmillion and a recent filing, was nearly double at 190 million. consider in message 284 that you didn't know what 'e' means or in message 928 that you didn't know how the 'e' is removed. consider in message 1041 that you assumed that the patent had gone through. or consider in message 1041 that you assumed that us biodefense was going to help diamondi acquire business with biodefense companies simply because of the title of the company, us biodefense.