Replies to post #127590 on Biotech Values

[DewDiligence]

From the Motion for limited expedited discovery you just posted:

The expedited discovery is necessary for Plaintiffs to protect themselves from irreparable harm and protect their patent rights. Given Defendants’ imminent launch and the substantial irreparable harm it will create, Plaintiffs plainly have an “urgent and compelling need for the requested discovery.”

The above argument was clearly a stretch in MNTA’s lawsuit against Teva, so it’s hardly surprising that the Judge in that case denied the motion for expedited discovery.