From the Motion for limited expedited discovery you just posted:
The expedited discovery is necessary for Plaintiffs to protect themselves from irreparable harm and protect their patent rights. Given Defendants’ imminent launch and the substantial irreparable harm it will create, Plaintiffs plainly have an “urgent and compelling need for the requested discovery.”
The above argument was clearly a stretch in MNTA’s lawsuit against Teva, so it’s hardly surprising that the Judge in that case denied the motion for expedited discovery.
“The efficient-market hypothesis may be the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated in any area of human knowledge!”
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.