News Focus
News Focus
Replies to #9401 on HOPE STOCKS
icon url

janice shell

09/17/11 3:42 PM

#9403 RE: jetpilot1101 #9401

Yes, the only real damage will be to whatever's left of his reputation, and to his self-esteem, perhaps.

But remember: When EIGH first produced that contract, it was dated September something, 2010. They then came up with a second one, dated much more recently, and tried to explain that the earlier one had never existed.

An explanation that was unconvincing in the extreme. So... Did Sully get stock twice? Did he perhaps sell the first lot when the price was still relatively high?
icon url

janice shell

09/17/11 3:56 PM

#9405 RE: jetpilot1101 #9401

Just strolling down Memory Lane... Here are the two Sully contracts, with the different dates. The first, dated 1 September 2010, is now "inactive" at OTCMarkets, but it's still there, and will always be there:

http://www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=EIGH&id=55354

The second--the "active" one--is dated 1 July 2011:

http://www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=EIGH&id=55362

Filing the first one was very careless of Bryant, but then he's always sloppy.