News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Toxic Avenger

08/10/11 8:52 PM

#32867 RE: loanranger #32866

There's no way someone paid $135k and 450k shares again for 1 interview. This has to be the result of the promotional fees from last year.

Even so, I'd say whoever paid the money and shares got shafted on this one. Karma can be pretty nasty.
icon url

skytrade604

08/10/11 9:18 PM

#32870 RE: loanranger #32866

Very bottom:
http://www.otcreporter.com/Reportdetails.asp?rptid=325

It says at the bottom that no shares have been sold, but on the new emails I’ve been getting every day it says they have. They have pumped GRNO tons of times so I assume that is an old page and the new emails are accurate. As far as the amount it possible they were given the same deal as the last promo.


The promo was done to keep up interest and keep us from dumping, not to sell paper. I’m sure they hoped it would be a bit better, but OTC Reporter is quite shitty and it’s well known.

OTC reporter is quite a cheap promoter. It is also possible they were not paid that full amount they are allowed to lie about that, it’s unlikely though in this situation. But there is no way they were not paid at all or this is old that’s not how it works.

A good promotion can cost $1M+