Then we disagree upon the definition of "reckless claim".
We already have two out of four of Monk's FLDs suspended for possible fraud by the SEC. This alone raises the possibility that PNTV will also end up there, since Monk was promoting PNTV in exactly the same was as he was promoting all of his FLDs.
The data *prove* that Monk and PNTV's management knew each other, associated with each other, and had some type of ongoing relationship during the time that Monk was promoting their stock. It raises the possibility that PNTV's management was involved in Monk's promotion of their stock. There is nothing "reckless" about any of these claims:
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
