You are obviously correct - very perceptive. I hazard that the letter was written in conjunction with a personal lawyer employed by Robert to protect him from any suggestion of complicity in malpractice. Nothing wrong with that and information of this caliber and detail is welcome at this time. Hitherto Robert has been notoriously mute. I strongly doubt the hand is that WDRP attorney's - unavoidable conflict of interest - and it's certainly not Andrew's who is incapable of putting two words together let alone two paragraphs without elementary and hideous errors of grammar and english construction.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
