F6, really? Surely you jest. I fail to see how prop 2 - voted on 2 June was an attempt to perform some kind of takeover manipulation BEFORE [your emphsis] NOK came in when WE ALL EXPECTED IT 2 DAYS before the NONBINDING vote. How do you come to that conclusion? If you mean for 3g, well, they have had several years and dozens of excuses - 'we're being sued', 'there is an indemnifyer out there somewhere and nobody will licsense with us', 'we had to fire Rip and Howard', 'the shareholders rejected our options grant raping of the treasury, 'NOK is being mean to us', 'were in economic/constructive/subtle/pick a word, discussions', and God knows what else.
I'm surprised it hasn't happened already, but to suggest that this is a, "completely vapid, empty and meaningless, indeed Orwellian, distraction and diversion of a concept to 'apply' to falsely label this situation" is a HUGE stretch. I would respectfully suggest that maintenance of the status quo is a, "completely vapid, empty and meaningless, indeed Orwellian, distraction and diversion of a concept to 'apply' to falsely label this situation."
Makes me want to pray that, "the next step will almost certainly be a campaign for the board, or failing the board for 'dissident' shareholders, to call/force the call of a special meeting of shareholders to vote on implementing the proposal, said special meeting presumably to be held before the end of this year -- where said next step will almost certainly begin sooner rather than later (if indeed it hasn't begun already)" actually is true.
IMO
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
