Replies to post #49395 on Starfleet Innotech Inc (SFIO)

[chunky-g]

cj, You don't think it's possible that TS's offenses were JUST the two? Do you think topdog made that up about Tom saying if he pled guilty the Company would be spared? Why do you assume the worst possible outcome? He was set up!! Yes he fell for it but look at how it happened? Petty! Why weren't there more charges? They should have listed them all right? Correct me if I'm wrong but there is a chance this could have a positive outcome right? Any chance?? You were very bullish on this company, more than anyone else at the time I might add. So are you mad at Tom? Mad at the FBI for being sneaky and setting them up? I'll bet TS was just naive and fell for it. Surely if that was it, they'll have leniency. I'm sure you won't agree!

[newmedman]

That's the crux of the biscuit.... The DTCC will not release any information as to why they suspended it. We can speculate all the obvious reasons but there really are no facts from the DTCC at this point. What troubles me is that I do not think that the DTCC is obligated to tell anyone anything.....In this great land of full disclosure why would the largest clearing house not have to disclose anything???

I mean what if tomorrow Reed Hastings gets caught giving shares to a hooker and the DTCC suspends Netflix for no reason other than an investigation? You think there would be a little stink raised? Would everyone run to the NFL# board and warn investors that its going to no bid?

It might not be 200+ a stub, but SFIO shareholders are not getting any answers from the company or the DTCC. All they are getting is speculation from brokers and board posters.

I mean no offense to Mr. Hastings, as I would kiss him on the lips if I saw him, but if he wound up in jail tomorrow, do you think that no one will ever get a DVD again? Would they all flock to Bankruptser? NO

They will take the hit and carry on!!!! Might be apples and oranges, but under the same circumstance, where would a short be standing?