News Focus
News Focus
icon url

lobogotti

05/26/05 2:59 PM

#117022 RE: skunksyard #117019

skunks, not wanting to argue, but fire is just posting HIS opinion. his take on how he is seeing it. nothing wrong with OPINIONS; honestly, why are you on him so much lately???


Posted by: firefight4
In reply to: DaddyDog who wrote msg# 116904 Date:5/26/2005 1:25:44 PM
Post #of 116944

dog, my bet is that Time Warner is backing Q. So it will be Time Warner's Q versus Viacom's LOGO. Just a gut feeling on my part. 2 media powerhouses competing for the huge underserved gay and lesbian tv market.


icon url

firefight4

05/26/05 3:02 PM

#117026 RE: skunksyard #117019

skunks, I do not know when that relationship would have to disclosed especially when dealing with a pinksheet stock. Let me ask you this, do you think Frank is telling the truth when he says they are working aggressively with Time Warner? Add in the hunting license and I think we have a decent case for Time Warner being a major player. They also used Time Warner to broadcast the Dinah Shore Event.
icon url

zeus1

05/26/05 3:52 PM

#117079 RE: skunksyard #117019

skunks, I totally agree with you. If TW were involved they would have been the first to carry Q not RCN.