Replies to post #36249 on Silver Falcon Mining Inc. (fka SFMI)

[longonau]

Roger Scammell is the ONLY reason I still own this stock. Well said Slinger.

[loanwolf]

That is a very good question...........

Perhaps naivety, more likely $$$, both ???

Scammell can always resign if he likes and no skin off his back.

I am unable to answer that question

He is a however name that is a key element to the SFMI "program" (up for interpretation)

Perhaps a name to be touted just as Dr. Helena in the past (lockheed martin connection)

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=3243307

Imo, PQ and SFMI crew is in the business of selling shares 1st, running a profitable company is a bonus. They still get paid success or fail, shareholders don't mean squat.

Prior history of dilution, raises of A/S, and no regards to common shareholders can't be denied.

This is a lotto play and a trading vehicle for the time being.

You actually "trust" these guys?

"However, I would ask for you to look deeper into SFMI current management. "


I am in the process of doing exactly that, perhaps I need a pair of those rose colored glasses.

I realize the shady past and despite that there's always the "what if" potential of SFMI.
I remember the failures of the old company but just recently stumbled across the legal proceeding filed against PQ for swing trading his own company in that old filing, so excuse me if that was hashed out or discussed since the morph into SFMI. I found it interesting, no?

Good luck tho

[lucky, mydog]

Why would Roger Scammell leave a very profitable mining business to come over to SFMI to screw up his reputation at the end of his career?

for money?