Replies to post #40471 on Tytan Holdings Inc (TYTN)

[Anthem]

It is not fact if you have no evidence to back it up. Then it is simply an invalid premise, which is what it still remains.

Until anyone can prove otherwise, TYTN has not paid promoters.

[Reinsman]

Your claim is that they have an investor relations firm that does work for them?

Is it not an inherent duty of an IR firm to promote the stock they represent?

I do not understand your assertion here. I am looking to get some clarification on this point.

If the point is that many of the stocks represented by this IR firm have done poorly, then I would suggest looking at the percentages of penny stocks that actually become highly successful businesses. If the percentage of failed businesses represented by this firm is higher than this percentage, then I would consider the point valid. I am not privy to this information, however. If you could provide this data to back up your claim, that would be great.

[Isobar]

"but as long as TYTN still uses the same promoters, based on what I've seen done to other stocks they promoted, the current A/S could be used up to raise money, then more shares issued as well."


You have seen other stocks affected negatively (by more shares being issued) by the same promoters TYTN has used.

Please provide who they are!

[longterm42]

if you refer to the IR person, that is a person where people go to get info on a co. a paid promoter is some one who goes out and try's by email or phone calls etc. to entice people to invest in a co. if you didnt know the difference, i understand. but as an assistend MOD, i would think you know the difference. so if you do still say TYTN used paid promoters, i expect you to name them