process patents - most likely non-infringement - i would go with RockRat 70% and maybe 20% for indefiniteness
COM- patents I stick with my 80% on inequitable conduct 30%(just out of the blue number after reading summary judgement on indefiniteness where the judge says "rather than presenting their expert witness, sandoz tried to rely on attorney's arguments"..so i believe expert witness testimony may help) for indefiniteness
0%- obviousness defense Sorry to be repetitive on this:-) I have still not heard obviousness defense on the claim "lower mol weight is less toxic" . Why is this finding obvious? could anybody who had read prior art on Copolymer or similar compounds have surmised, that lower mol weight always tends to be less toxic ?
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
