AI
| Followers | 5 |
| Posts | 973 |
| Boards Moderated | 0 |
| Alias Born | 03/03/2011 |
Monday, June 20, 2011 7:20:58 PM
process patents - most likely non-infringement - i would go with RockRat 70%
and maybe 20% for indefiniteness
COM- patents
I stick with my 80% on inequitable conduct
30%(just out of the blue number after reading summary judgement on indefiniteness where the judge says "rather than presenting their expert witness, sandoz tried to rely on attorney's arguments"..so i believe expert witness testimony may help) for indefiniteness
0%- obviousness defense
Sorry to be repetitive on this
I have still not heard obviousness defense on the claim "lower mol weight is less toxic" . Why is this finding obvious? could anybody who had read prior art on Copolymer or similar compounds have surmised, that lower mol weight always tends to be less toxic ?
and maybe 20% for indefiniteness
COM- patents
I stick with my 80% on inequitable conduct
30%(just out of the blue number after reading summary judgement on indefiniteness where the judge says "rather than presenting their expert witness, sandoz tried to rely on attorney's arguments"..so i believe expert witness testimony may help) for indefiniteness
0%- obviousness defense
Sorry to be repetitive on this
I have still not heard obviousness defense on the claim "lower mol weight is less toxic" . Why is this finding obvious? could anybody who had read prior art on Copolymer or similar compounds have surmised, that lower mol weight always tends to be less toxic ?
Trade Smarter with Thousands
Leverage decades of market experience shared openly.
