News Focus
News Focus
icon url

RockRat

06/20/11 12:25 PM

#3939 RE: investorgold2002 #3926

You give indefiniteness 0% odds and call that "decent"?

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=64396672

I more or less agree with your weighting, inasmuch as MNTA lost a motion for summary judgement on these grounds. But the odds for each patent are different. Anyway, where you and I and others will agree to disagree is on the odds of a win on inequitable conduct versus double patenting/obviousness.

My weighting of the odds on the CoP-1 patents

Double patenting/obviousness 60%

Inequitable conduct 35%

Non-infringement 10%

Indefiniteness 5%

For the process patents & such

70% for non-infringement

20% for indefiniteness

Zip for other grounds.

Regards, RockRat