News Focus
News Focus
Followers 10
Posts 903
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/19/2005

Re: investorgold2002 post# 3926

Monday, 06/20/2011 12:25:13 PM

Monday, June 20, 2011 12:25:13 PM

Post# of 20689
You give indefiniteness 0% odds and call that "decent"?

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=64396672

I more or less agree with your weighting, inasmuch as MNTA lost a motion for summary judgement on these grounds. But the odds for each patent are different. Anyway, where you and I and others will agree to disagree is on the odds of a win on inequitable conduct versus double patenting/obviousness.

My weighting of the odds on the CoP-1 patents

Double patenting/obviousness 60%

Inequitable conduct 35%

Non-infringement 10%

Indefiniteness 5%

For the process patents & such

70% for non-infringement

20% for indefiniteness

Zip for other grounds.

Regards, RockRat