Bulldzr, you are really WAY off base in your last post -
"You don't know anymore about some 'bancorp' preceding than I know about knitting socks" - Given its extreme importance to IDCC, you might want to familiarize yourself with Bancorp:
US Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall Partnership, 513 US 18 (1994):
Also, see Nok's Motion, pacer #768 which cited Bancorp and compelled Judge Lynn to reinstate the vacated PSJs in her Order, Pacer #776, which is now the basis of our Appeal.
"In spite of this so called 'adverse, very damaging' legal action Ericy did settle with IDCC, didn't they?" - Ericy and IDCC expected the PSJs to be vacated which they were. Now that they have been SUBSEQUENTLY reinstated, to the MONUMENTAL detriment of IDCC, unless the Court of Appeal re-vacates them, we may have a WHOLE NEW BALL GAME for IDCC and our current 2G revenue base, including Ericy, SE, and all the other paying licensees.
FYI, the Court of Appeal asked about damages to IDCC from the reinstatement, and IDCC admitted this was affecting current licensing negotiations (to say the LEAST):
"Judge Bryson-..Are you really prejudiced by this? In any way? IDCC - Sure - with ongoing licensing activities with 3rd parties, where the discussions are based upon the situation after vacatur."
This GRAVE risk COULD have been entirely and easily AVOIDED.
"Who Is Feeding You This Crap?..You don't know shit about 'Bancorp'.. who fed you that" - No one tells me what to post. I have read all the above documents - have you?
"spreading lies and half-truths trying to further their point of view..Who Is Feeding You This Crap?..I think you are a liar..You are twisting the truth and trying to mislead people in furtherance of your and someone else's agenda" - You are really WAY off the reservation with your remarks and I really don't know what you are referring to when you say "twisting the truth and trying to mislead people". Also, in case you forgot, I am the contributor to this board that obtained and posted the Appeal briefs.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
