News Focus
News Focus
icon url

creapingman

06/12/11 8:51 PM

#237935 RE: joecanouse #237934

Explain then. Where is the value. You seem more content posting here than releasing info officially thru Q. So why not let us know right here right now. I mean you could fabricate any thing here and not be held accountable correct? So let it flow Joe, lets see what u got for us commons.
icon url

artfink

06/12/11 9:17 PM

#237937 RE: joecanouse #237934

Mineseeker is only being written off because Quasar FAILED to hold up their end of the option.
icon url

Bullstocks

06/12/11 10:32 PM

#237938 RE: joecanouse #237934

Joe,

If you are really interested in seeing QASP work, why not get out of the way and let Jeff and James do what needs to be done? Obviously Kendrick wants nothing to do with you. If you genuinely want to help QASP and if you genuinely want to come across as being a smart professional CEO type, then withdraw from the suit and turn the comapny back over to Jeff.

I think we all know the real reason you won't do that and it has to do with the things you and your team did to QASP through offshore efforts.

Stop waving that 8 million dollar banner over your head as if it were real. No one here is being fooled by it.
icon url

artfink

06/12/11 11:02 PM

#237940 RE: joecanouse #237934

Joe, can you comment on the context of this post? Why don't you step aside and let Jeff and James control QASP knowing full well that you have a 169k debt that would be in line for payment once they start producing revenue?

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=64162703

That post is RIGHT ON POINT. If Joe just wanted his 169k plus interest he would let Jeff and James run QASP, would have merged with Centacom, and have a growing company that could also go after whatever previous investments QASP may be able to salvage. And guess what, if JEFF and JAMES were running QASP i bet the Ol Mineseeker would come aboard. You know Ol MIneseeker the pump and dump scam as Kwan referred to is as but Joe so desparately wants.

JOE. Step aside, let Jeff and James take control of QASP, get mineseeker under the shell, merge Centacom as well, start producing revenue and earnings, and GO FORWARD. GET THIS THING OUT OF COURT.

JOe, whatcha say?
icon url

Sharktnk

06/12/11 11:58 PM

#237941 RE: joecanouse #237934

i will just be out my 169k plus interest



Plus interest?

That would be nice for those of us in here for two years ...
icon url

catdaddyrt

06/13/11 9:03 AM

#237948 RE: joecanouse #237934

I bet you have joey -I bet you have



i will just be out my 169k plus interest etc... which is something in wont be happy about, but have already accounted for...

icon url

Stockfire409

06/13/11 12:11 PM

#237960 RE: joecanouse #237934

FYI TO QASP SHAREHOLDERS...3 Questions I have on good authority that Joe knows the answers to:

3 questions shareholders should ask Joe:

1.) Post a copy to the shareholders, the agreement between Quasar and Mineseeker that shows the $10 million deal that shows the 1.7 mill paid as a "Non refundable Option"

2.) Have you Joe, rec'd an offer from Mineseeker in good faith to help recoup the $1.7 million and have you rejected that deal?

3.) Have you met with and tried to make a deal with Mineseeker under your Trophy company thusly trying to remove Quasar and it's shareholders from Mineseeker all together and benefit solely from the deal?
icon url

artfink

06/14/11 10:39 AM

#237996 RE: joecanouse #237934

JOE, WHY HAVE YOU NOT RESPONDED TO ANY OF THESE QUESTIONS?

FYI TO QASP SHAREHOLDERS...3 Questions I have on good authority that Joe knows the answers to:

3 questions shareholders should ask Joe:

1.) Post a copy to the shareholders, the agreement between Quasar and Mineseeker that shows the $10 million deal that shows the 1.7 mill paid as a "Non refundable Option"

2.) Have you Joe, rec'd an offer from Mineseeker in good faith to help recoup the $1.7 million and have you rejected that deal?

3.) Have you met with and tried to make a deal with Mineseeker under your Trophy company thusly trying to remove Quasar and it's shareholders from Mineseeker all together and benefit solely from the deal?
icon url

Stockfire409

06/14/11 11:43 AM

#237999 RE: joecanouse #237934

Joe Canouse...in question 3 I asked publically if you we're and or are trying to pull Mineseeker out from under the Quasar shareholders. I have it under GOOD AUTHORITY that you are.

3.) Have you met with and tried to make a deal with Mineseeker under your Trophy company thusly trying to remove Quasar and it's shareholders from Mineseeker all together and benefit solely from the deal? YOU OWE THESE PEOPLE THE TRUTH...THE ANSWER...PLAIN AND SIMPLE.