News Focus
News Focus
icon url

str8shooter69

05/03/11 4:36 AM

#232954 RE: samplescave #232953

The only problem that I can see with the case you are making is: you have to try in order to fail, dean never tried.
icon url

gattes12

05/03/11 7:12 AM

#232958 RE: samplescave #232953

Samples agreed at every level.

Except here:

He always had the "Legal Loophole" called the Forward Looking Statement to back him up in case he failed.



While this is normally true the slip-up (if you will) occured here:

http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=41463239

The catch-all statement is right here:

The reason for this change is that the terms of the funding of the balance of our $350,000,000 financing requires us to issue Class B non-voting shares equal to forty percent of the total outstanding common stock to the lender.



Because the A/S was increased and shares were in fact issued to someone this statement is no longer foward-loking. It is binding. The question is if the shares were issued then where's the money?

I've posted this time and time again. Because I'm the one posting it, it gets ignored.

simply put shareholders would have either Dean or the "lender" by the balls.

To date no one has touched this. Not even Jeff.
icon url

Adjustedtosteep

05/03/11 8:20 AM

#232963 RE: samplescave #232953

Quote By Mr. Samples

A little Stink Pink that no one wants



For it to be a company that no one wants, someone sure is working awfully hard to get it. And you can bet the 160k debt is not the motivation for this show of desperation.....LOL
icon url

Britpack

05/03/11 8:31 AM

#232965 RE: samplescave #232953

How would you know what Joe or Boatman are or are not?
icon url

wvu_mnteers

05/03/11 8:49 AM

#232967 RE: samplescave #232953

So Dean purchasing a company with Quasar shareholder money and putting a third of it in his own name is legal? As Dr. Evil would say... "riiiiiiggggghhhhhttttt".
icon url

baldeagle9999

05/03/11 8:54 AM

#232968 RE: samplescave #232953

I said Dean did nothing wrong Legally, but "Morally and Ethically", he should burn in Hell for what he did.

So let me get this straight, Dean did nothing wrong legally but the company accountants, after finding out about the $10M phantom company sale to QASP, ceased their work for the company and suggested he retain legal counsel.

That has to be one of the dumbest things that I have read here to date.

We should belive you saying Dean did nothing illegal, and the auditors were just over reacting? You are kidding right?

Why do you fill space on this board with such blatant misinformation?
icon url

texkengold

05/03/11 10:16 AM

#232977 RE: samplescave #232953

Dooley, I am not Short with QASP.
I never bought back in since I sold at .032

I have my Trading Accounts to prove it.

Boatman is not Short and Joe is not Short.

okay lets see what you have so prove it? and how would you know about Joe and boatman?
icon url

1fatcat2

05/03/11 11:13 AM

#232999 RE: samplescave #232953

I have stated that Dean did nothing wrong "legally", but most have twisted this statement.



That will be determined by those more qualified than you. You may believe that, however the courts will have the final say.