News Focus
News Focus
icon url

op9171787

04/26/11 3:52 PM

#135039 RE: mastaflash #135038

not sure what you're inferring, and it is agreed that the wanker letter didnt have any power to quash an SFC investigation (had the SFC willed it)into the filthy dtcc, but what megas did in his response was NOT helpful, at the very least. and a Senate committee does have a LOT of power. power to bring parties in to explain - under oath - what they did or didnt do. we werent at that point yet, but even with pre-committee investigations, questions could have been asked under penalty of perjury.

perhaps, but maybe not, megas should have 'played ball' - I mean the DTCC had already claimed something EASILY re-buttable. (the T/A comment)

icon url

kruy

04/27/11 2:21 AM

#135048 RE: mastaflash #135038

Never has the SFC inferred that the "wanker" letter single handedly put the "kobosh" on the investigation...the investigation itself did that, as the facts did not support what the Megasites were trying to pull off. The wanker letter simply cemented this to where it already had been relegated, not to mention the true character of the author.

Funny how everybody and anybody that looks into this can figure out what's what in regards BCIT, which always directly contradicts the Megasites assertions...huh...odd indeed.