Replies to post #31034 on VirTra Inc (VTSI)

[stormer]

You have to consider why shareholders can vote on these amendments. Voting against what management wants isn't evil. Should this stock ever get uplisted to Nasdaq, there won't be any chance of passing amendments that take away power from shareholders. A reasonable RS after an audit and definite plans to uplist would likely pass, but not the other amendments -- especially an amendment that would prevent Virtra from uplisting to where they plan to go.

Right now, I haven't a clue what to make of this stock, although the company has improved in the ways you stated.

[billpr]

Al.. With all that going for us, why in your esteemed opinion, did you have your shares in the tax loss files or the toilet, I forget exactly what you said, and why has the PPS remained at .07-.08 for a long, long, long time??? Why did you go nuts when there was any mention of getting off the PINKS? What has given you this undying faith that Managment even gives the slightest sh-t about you personally that you continue to take this flack from the naysayers and purveyors of doom?? Has Management been so good to you over all these years to deserve the loyalty that you seem to offer them??

[ztect]

Show me where I wrote one false statement

The PE with unaudited financials is not a fact. You are the one making a false statement. Moreover if the audit reveals that the value attributed to intellectual property is overstated (as some here suggest), then you're also making a false statement that the company is in the black.

Additionally comments from you regarding forward splits, uplisting, auditing, are all forward looking statements. None of those are "facts". None have occurred. None may occur. If an audit had already occurred, prior to an r/s proxy, than any forward looking statement alluding to a future uplisting would be more credible since the audit would be "fact" since it had already taken place.

You have faith, not facts.

Post RS, the company will also be better positioned to go private . That is not a false statement. Going private (via a buyout) is also another viable business option open to VTSI's management. During the CC, Ferris specifically didn't rule that option out. He noted, at the time of the call, that "at this time" the company is not in conversations with any one. Though other proxy items could be construed as being consistent with this objective since a reduction in majorities, and directors, makes any future proxies easier to pass.

So regarding my statements; I don't claim any to be a "fact" anyway whatsoever. There are a number of other possible scenario that may or may not occur. As an investor, you have to look at all possible scenarios. Personally, if a company states an objective like uplisting, I'd rather see a course of action consistent with that action before more drastic measures like a 1 to 100 r/s are pursued.

So are you 14 years old? Can you not engage in a conversation without calling others names? If some one doesn't accept your point of view, do they have to have ulterior motives? Guess you're not married, or then again, may be you are LOL

Signing off for tonight