News Focus
News Focus
icon url

janice shell

04/29/05 7:30 PM

#163041 RE: gump90 #163031

I have no clue about the dividend ratios that were used nor who calculated them using what numbers.

If you don't, then you haven't been paying attention. It was proved beyond any shadow of a doubt that Glenn calculated the divvy ratios and reported them to the Nasdaq.
icon url

matrix

04/29/05 7:46 PM

#163053 RE: gump90 #163031

Come on gump. You know very well this particular issue has facts behind it which don't add up.

FACT: The company released a PR in July 2004 stating they would distribute 40 billion CIM shares pro rata: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_2004_July_20/ai_n6113690

FACT: The company submitted a ratio payout (.0256) to Nasdaq who in turn published it on their OTCBB website: http://otcbb.com/asp/dividend.asp?sym_id=cmkx

FACT: Using the distribution and payout ratio, the calculated o/s is 1.56 trillion.
40 billion CIM X 1 CMKX / .0256 CIM = 1.56 trillion CMKX shares

FACT: The company released a PR in Mar 2005 stating the o/s was 703.5 billion, which is half of the calculated o/s using the CIM payout ratio and divy total
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_2005_March_4/ai_n11850542

A tough miner-type like you should not be afraid to request the attorney ask a legit question to Urbie during this upcoming hearing. This is a golden opportunity to try and get one of the mysteries solved.