News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Biochemist2002

04/07/11 7:47 PM

#143331 RE: gump90 #143328

That is one opinion.

I have seen it from both sides, and tried to be objective.

As has been stated numerous times before, time (and the drill) will tell.

The rest is just opinion.
icon url

geo_newfie

04/07/11 8:10 PM

#143335 RE: gump90 #143328

The reason...

Vale has not ruled out that area yet. Plain and simple. So to say that it means absolutely nothing is wrong.

They dropped the other areas because their geologists have determined that these areas are not promising. Once they get more information on the other areas they will assess whether to keep those claims too.

My opinion, but based on actual experience too.
icon url

tommer

04/07/11 8:11 PM

#143336 RE: gump90 #143328

Nothing is shot down....only baseless assertions....
it is sad how this board is getting....
complete waste of time now