News Focus
News Focus
icon url

TASBES0101

04/01/11 6:56 PM

#24648 RE: water boy #24647

Very impressive, waterboy!
icon url

Belize

04/01/11 7:09 PM

#24652 RE: water boy #24647

No brother water boy, it's not an opinion, it's a fact and you are correct. Lets not talk about the design of the heat exchanger itself. If they only knew !!!!!!!! GO WDRP !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
icon url

n1tr08urner

04/01/11 7:18 PM

#24654 RE: water boy #24647

Yes, exactly, heat transfer rate! Especially for when small amounts of hot water are needed an existing system would need to get very hot very fast because it's transfer rate is poor. That would draw more power than a system that only does the minimum necessary. And once water is not needed anymore a lot of that heat would still be there in the elements. For longer uses I would guess the differences would be smaller since once a traditional system gets warmed up whatever heat is there will ultimately get transferred to the water at some point. And the elements may even switch off completely with a thermostat in some systems if they are hot enough for what is needed, which the magnetron would not be able to do. I would assume other losses, like heat to the environment through the enclosure and the resistance of the components would be similar to existing systems.

Anyway, at this point we will know soon enough what the deal is. And i don't think there needs to be a huge improvement in the bottom line cost of ownership and operation (which is really what matters in the end the most) for this thing to be a success. The market is huge, even if only considering home water heaters and there are so many other uses.