News Focus
News Focus
icon url

weeblewobble09

03/31/11 12:22 PM

#30141 RE: NicoleMarie #30140

An r/s would be much better accepted if it meant Nasdaq.
icon url

billpr

03/31/11 12:36 PM

#30142 RE: NicoleMarie #30140

NM: I think you're missing the point. Despite all the angst virtually noone is against a R/S. It is a necessary step in moving this company forward (off the Pinks).. The problem IMO and others is that a 1:100 R/S would seriously damage our investment by tanking the PPS to a level, that despite earnings, contracts, etc might be impossible to overcome. Further, whether you think so or not, some of the other amendments do nothing, zero, nada, nil for the shareholders who have supported this company through all the bad times..R/S 1:15, or 20, or 25 fine with me...

If you have already voted its not too late to change your Vote to NO...