Replies to post #29907 on VirTra Inc (VTSI)

[ztect]

Al4343 do you even understand the liquidity issue? Your post suggests that you don't, yet you cheer lead like a 12 yr old girl.

I'm personally not vilifying management, I'm asking Bob to sign an audited filing compliant with SOX, to clearly demonstrate that he stands behind all the earning reports issued by this company. Any institutional investor would ask the same exact thing before doing the same no matter what the company's capital structure. Any client deterred by a low PPS, that's doing DD on this company would like this as well. Without Bob willing to put his signature behind reports issued, the numbers put forth by company simply won't be viewed as credible by institutions especially in light of companies that caused the enactment of SOX. Are you really such a naive and unquestioning person who acts solely on faith?

A SOX compliant AUDIT has to come before an r/s is even proposed.

Bob put the cart in front of the horse. Such an audit will give the company greater credibility, and very likely cause the price to rise benefiting current shareholders An audit NOW rather than at some yet to be determined time in the future, puts the horse back in front of the cart

[LeGoose]

AL43,

Since the R/S was "discovered", VTSI has lost over $4.5 MILLION in market cap.

From our recent highs to today's paint job close of .0795, we've lost $6.4MILLION in market cap.

My opinion? Screw the 1 or 2 purchasing managers that are financially retarded enough to deny a purchase based solely on a vendor's stock price

Vote NO to the RS and allow management to present us, the company owners and financiers, with a more intelligent offer. Then we can talk.

[SirFelix]

It's sad to see such fear mongering succeed over this proxy vote. The loudest negativity seems to win nowadays, ala The Tea Party in our own personal Virtra townhall meeting.

There are 4 views in a 2-sided debate:
Argue for something to result in a good outcome.
Argue for something to prevent a bad outcome.
Argue against something to result in a good outcome.
Argue against something to prevent a bad outcome.

Those using a bad outcome to prove their arguement will typically come out on top. Thats why political smear campaigns tend to bring positive results.

I'm waiting for someone to question Ferris's place of birth next. LOL