News Focus
News Focus
icon url

_mmech

03/23/11 9:08 AM

#560 RE: hedge_fun #559

I think maybe you should get in touch with the SEC and report them if you feel they have violated securities regulations, hopefully they will investigate it and clear up any of the filing issues you and others have with VGE. Reporting violations on an investors board may not be the appropriate place the get resolution to grievences
icon url

ryjbench

03/23/11 9:46 AM

#561 RE: hedge_fun #559

Hey EVERYBODY! Guess what, HEDGE now decides for Viaspace what they need to file and dont need to file. He just calls Jan up and tells him, "Hey Jan PR that will ya?"

Are you serious? Really Hedge, let me help ya out, go re-read your post and think about it for a while and when you have, think about this.

They created a company we just found out about and is over a year old, wasnt in the filings or PR'd. They didn't file any revenues expenses etc on RUBA and you think that they cant have grass growing on somebody elses land in Singapore because they didn't FILE or excuse me PR it?

WOW. LMAO!

icon url

tommy 9 fingers

03/23/11 10:41 AM

#562 RE: hedge_fun #559

Good post... i wish the article pointed out the PR rules apply to both the Nasdaq and the OTCBB for sure...

Lets assume they do ... My take on the PR and 8K info in that article still tells me that VGE hiring a new director and therefore must 8K or PR this fact using one of the methods... Also if the Dir. Wang did leave his position this must be done as well.. So the lack of these being done tells me to pay attention to them.

My take on this this PR vs. 8K thing is that Dr.K didn't want to PR about the new VGE Director in Singapore or make it look like he didn't want to, but knew he had to PR something under the rules. Maybe he is hoping he can rely on just telling the SEC it was a mistake or accodemtal ommission that he did not include the new director info in the same PR. But he did PR this VGE LTD and I think MMech's idea that he didn't have to is incorrect. JMO

Dr.K if anything does file religiously, so it is not like him to make a mistake or I should say Muzi... So I don't think this was accidental ommission on their part.

From what I saw on the docs, was that VGE PTE LTD was Incorporated on 07/23/2010 but......

The directors of the company were not appointed until 02/08/2011 So he may claim that offically he didn't have to PR or 8K because there were no directors until 02/2011 but...

The PR about VGE PTD LTD didn't come out until 03/01/2011 or about 21 days late ... I know you can file or ask for extensions to the requirements of 8K's up to 15 days I think.

There is a nugget in all this that we just need to connect the dots on...As I find it funny that Dr.K who IMO would PR he got a new pair of underwear if he thought it would raise the PPS while he sold his shares ...LOL... take his time on PRing the VGE PTD LTD info...

You know it could be as simple as Patrick asked him not to PR or 8K him until this court case Dr. Fong brought against him and Clean Tec was over or almost over so as not to involve VSPC ... but then...

Why would Patrick allow Clean tec to put stuff on their website about GKG??